The Martian (2015)

2016 #25
Ridley Scott | 142 mins | Blu-ray | 2.40:1 | USA & UK / English | 12 / PG-13

Oscar statue2016 Academy Awards
7 nominations

Nominated: Best Picture, Best Actor (Matt Damon), Best Adapted Screenplay, Best Sound Mixing, Best Sound Editing, Best Visual Effects, Best Production Design.



Ridley Scott’s latest arrives on Blu-ray in the UK today, with a disappointing dearth of special features (disliked Exodus gets a 2½-hour making-of, four hours of additional features, plus a commentary; award-winning The Martian gets 24 minutes plus a few in-universe documentaries — what?!) Never mind that, though: how good is the film deemed the best comedy or musical of 2015? (If you somehow missed that news, you’ll appreciate the addition of a “seriously” here.)

In the relatively near future, mankind is on its third manned mission to Mars. When a colossal storm rolls in, the decision to made to evacuate the Mars base. During the escape, biologist Mark Watney (Matt Damon) is struck by debris and apparently killed, and his crew mates are forced to leave him for dead. He isn’t dead, though, but he is injured and alone on a planet 140 million miles from home, with no way to communicate with Earth, and not enough energy, oxygen, or food to see him through the four years until the next Mars mission is scheduled to arrive. Refusing to give in to inevitable death, Watney only has one choice: science the shit out of this.

That sounds like a laugh-a-minute premise, right? And there’s a major subplot about disco music, so it’s practically a musical too!

No, the HFPA are just idiots — The Martian is neither a comedy nor a musical. It is the latest in a growing subgenre of serious-minded near-future sci-fi adventures, though, following in the footsteps of 2013 Oscar winner Gravity and 2014 Oscar washout Interstellar. Where The Martian differs is in the element that tricked Golden Globes voters into thinking they could get away with giving it a comedy nomination (and win): rather than being stuffed to bursting with po-faced peril, it has a lightness of touch and regular doses of humour, making it probably the most feel-good serious sci-fi movie since ever.

Whether that’s appropriate or not is another matter. A well-argued review by the ghost of 82 assesses that the film has none of the darkness or loneliness you should expect of a man stranded alone on an alien world with a slim chance of survival or rescue. I don’t disagree that the film doesn’t contain much of that feeling, nor would I argue that such a tone isn’t a viable way to frame this narrative, but I don’t think that’s what Scott was aiming to convey. This telling of the story (I haven’t read the original novel, so can’t say how it compares tonally) is an adventure; a feel-good tale of hope and survival against the odds. The film doesn’t offer us despair because Watney doesn’t despair — he just gets on with trying to fix it. On the couple of occasions when his fixes go wrong, his chirpiness breaks down, his frustration comes out, and in some respects it’s all the more effective for being limited to those handful of occasions — we’re suddenly reminded that, in spite of his optimism and his success and all the fun we’re having watching it, he’s stranded 140 million miles away and even the slightest mistake can spell total disaster.

Matt Damon is a talented enough actor to lead us through all of this. Best remembered in recent years for serious fare like the Bourne films (“serious” in the sense of “not comedic” as opposed to “realistic”), Damon has done his fair share of comedies before now, and skits for TV shows and the like too. This is perhaps his first film to bring those two sides together as equally necessary parts of the whole — serious when he’s struggling with science problems or facing the reality of his situation, funny when he’s taking it all as light-heartedly as he can. Sometimes, such as in emotional conversations with friends or colleagues stuck millions of miles away, he even has to do both at once.

While Damon is stuck on Mars by himself, a starry supporting cast actually get to interact with each other. This is a quality ensemble and, short of writing an epic essay of a review where I just praise them all one by one, there’s little to do but list their names. That said, Jessica Chastain gets the most brazenly emotional beats as the commander who chose to leave Watney behind and has to face the consequences of her decision; Jeff Daniels treads a line between being an evil bureaucrat and just a regular bureaucrat (apparently consideration was given to turning him into a full-blown villain; thank goodness they swerved that bullet); Chiwetel Ejiofor brings easy gravitas to NASA’s director of Mars missions; Michael Peña provides some additional comic relief, if not as strikingly as he did in Ant-Man then at least as effectively; and Sean Bean doesn’t die. No offence to Sean Bean, but let’s be honest, at this point in his career that is the most notable facet of his appearance here. That and the Lord of the Rings reference.

It would be too damning to describe Ridley Scott’s direction as unremarkable, but at the same time it feels lacking in distinctiveness. Apparently there was some interview where he commented on how easy he found directing The Martian, I think with intended reference to the use of digital photography, but I think you get a sense of that from the film as a whole. That stops it from being over-directed, at least, and it’s certainly not poorly made, but if you didn’t know then you wouldn’t be nodding along going, “oh yes, this is definitely a Ridley Scott movie.” I’m not sure that’s a bad thing. Considering his fiddling is what scuppered the promising screenplays that initiated both Robin Hood and Prometheus, and his other works this decade (The Counsellor and Exodus: Gods and Kings) haven’t exactly met with great acclaim, maybe his dropping in almost as a director-for-hire (screenwriter Drew Goddard was attached to direct, but got sidetracked into the now-cancelled Sinister Six Amazing Spider-Man spin-off), and helming the film in a kind of directorial autopilot, is part of what saved it from a similar fate.

I’ve read at least one review that described The Martian as “an instant sci-fi classic”, and at least one other that described it as “no sci-fi classic”. I’m going to sit on the fence of that debate for the time being. What I will say is that it is undoubtedly an accomplished piece of entertainment. For a film that primarily concerns itself with a man applying scientific principles to tasks like “growing potatoes”, that’s surely some kind of achievement. In our current climate (both in society in general and in the “more explosions less talking, please” state of blockbuster cinema), to make space travel — and science in general — seem fun and appealing to the masses is no bad thing whatsoever.

5 out of 5

As mentioned, The Martian is released on DVD and Blu-ray in the UK today.

It placed 17th on my list of The 20 Best Films I Saw For the First Time in 2016, which can be read in full here.

Advertisements

13 thoughts on “The Martian (2015)

  1. Enjoyed this one – I had read the book previously and was pleased to find the film followed it fairly accurately; the biggest difference is that in the novel Watney is a Scot, which makes you wonder why they didn’t think someone like Ewan McGregor was viable for the role. Still, Damon’s absolutely fine and for me this was one that couldn’t really go wrong because the concept is so strong and the main character quite a stoical, practical and winning personality. Honestly, reading the novel (before any film adaptation was mooted and I knew nothing about the story) I was certain that at some point there would be extra terrestrial intervention in some shape or form, and what a pleasure to find there was none of that and Watney’s solutions were through intelligence and hard work.

    Good write up, and I think you’re spot on about Scott’s ‘hands off’ direction of the material. I still like the guy’s movies, even EXODUS (whilst admitting it isn’t all that good really, and not a patch on De Mille’s films), but I think THE MARTIAN kind of works despite him rather than because he’s there.

    Liked by 1 person

    • I feel like Scott’s a director you can never quite write off — he’ll produce a string of poorly-regarded films, then suddenly turn round and unleash something everyone loves. I’ve still not seen Exodus, actually, so, fingers crossed.

      Liked by 1 person

      • As long as your expectations aren’t too high then you should quite enjoy it – there are some nice attempts to show how the various “miracles” might have their basis in logic, and for me Christian Bale’s pretty good. Obviously being Scott it looks fantastic and the CGI Egyptian city is the match of Rome in GLADIATOR and KINGDOM OF HEAVEN’s Jerusalem, but I guess we might expect that from him now.0

        Liked by 1 person

        • They snuck short making-of featurettes onto some unrelated Blu-rays back when it was coming to cinemas, mainly showing off the massive sets they’d built, so I can well imagine it satisfies on a spectacle level.

          Liked by 1 person

  2. I think you nailed it regards the direction; I’m a big fan of Ridley Scott ever since Alien, and while I’m impressed at how efficient and confident the direction is here, I’m rather appaled at how lazy and unimaginative it is too. Its light years away from how ambitious Alien, Blade Runner and, tellingly, even Legend were.

    Maybe Ridley is too old to marshall the fire in his belly anymore, but the last time I recall him really pushing with something personal and ambitious was Kingdom of Heaven’s directors cut.

    Twenty years ago Ridley Scotts The Martian might have lacked modern-day cgi fx candy but it would have been much more interesting/powerful.

    Liked by 1 person

    • He’s directed 12 films in the last 15 years, which is actually quite a rate to have worked at — it’s no wonder some/most/all have suffered for it, really.

      Everyone seemed shocked when he wasn’t nominated for the Best Director Oscar for The Martian, I think because he was emerging as a frontrunner, but if he had won I think it would’ve been more for his career rather than this film (much as when Scorsese won for The Departed).

      Liked by 1 person

      • He also has an hand producing all sorts of other projects/tv stuff as well, likely in limited capacity but still some kind of distraction (Amazons Man in the High Castle and that Child 44 flick for example).

        I would have preferred fewer directing gigs to be honest- its a formidable amount of work and I guess he’s racing against time/doing what he loves but fewer films would have helped keep the quality level up. That all said, the speed he did The Martian’s pre-production, shoot and post is astonishing frankly, considering how complex the project was. Its a marvel it turned out as good as it did. He gets a lot of flack but I guess we should appreciate he is still around and enjoy his films, God knows we’ve lost other greats too soon like Kubrick and Leone.

        Liked by 1 person

        • He also wouldn’t be the first great director to create a large body of work with at least as many less-acclaimed films as classics — no shame in that. Maybe if we’re lucky he’ll have learnt the lessons of Prometheus and his next one will be a good’un too.

          Liked by 1 person

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s